top of page
  • Writer's pictureSarah Fields

The Guardian Intentionally Misleads for the Purpose of Murdering Babies.

They lie straight to your face. But because the media is not calling it misinformation, the willfully ignorant and the naive fall for it hook, line and sinker. The Guardian recently published an article with the following image attached...

The Guardian claimed that this is what a pregnancy actually looks like at the 10 week gestational mark. The article shows a progression of photos just like this one; as the “blob” simply continues to get larger but is somehow void of one essential participant of a pregnancy... the child. The article continues on to state that “This image shows the gestational sac of a nine-week pregnancy. This is everything that would be removed during an abortion and includes the nascent embryo, which is not easily discernible to the naked eye.” (Except that at 9-10 weeks gestation, a child is actually about the size of an apricot and is very much visible to the naked eye.) The images were supplied to the Guardian by the MYA Network, a network of clinicians and activists, who came together during the pandemic and wanted to show the world what an early stage pregnancy actually looked like. Have you every looked up the exact definition of a clinician? It is “a doctor having direct contact with and responsibility for patients, rather than one involved with theoretical or laboratory studies.”

The photos are a blatant lie. Where are the misinformation queens and kings? Where are the fact checkers? This article defies every iota of biology, science and common sense that you have had access to your entire life. If you are a parent, you watched the screen with your own eyes when you arrived to your first ultrasound. You can see the little hands and feet. You can see a tiny human and hear the beating heart.

Let's use a little bit of critical thinking for a moment. Dismemberment abortions (or a D&E) occur from the 13th week of pregnancy. Dismemberment abortions are typically performed between 13 and 24 weeks of pregnancy when a baby is too large to remove as a whole. This timeframe is only three weeks from the photo shown by the Guardian. (Magically, a transformation from a white blob to a fully formed child must happen in this three week span). At 13 weeks of development, a baby has a beating heart, fully developed arms and legs, and can swallow, yawn, hiccup, and smile. Once an abortion has been performed, The abortionist then collects all of the baby’s parts and reassembles them to make sure that all of the pieces have been removed. Read that last sentence again. How can an abortionist determine that “all of the pieces of a child are present and accounted for” if a 10 week pregnancy truly looks like the photo shown?

The following explanation of an abortion was pulled from the Reach Out Women’s Center website, where it explains the process of a first trimester abortion by use of suction. (Less than 13 weeks)

The Procedure -

"The abortionist will swab the cervix with Betadine, an antiseptic, hold the cervix with a clamping tool and then inject anesthetic into the cervix to numb it. If further stretching of the cervix is needed, metal rods of different diameters are inserted into the cervix. Next, a plastic or metal tube called a cannula is inserted through the cervix into the uterus. The cannula is attached to a vacuum that is used to suck the baby out of the uterus. A curette may also be used to scrape the sides of the uterus to ensure that no parts of the baby are left in the uterus. While it is recommended that abortionists use ultrasounds during the procedure, not all abortionists do so. After the baby is taken out of the uterus, the baby’s tissue will be examined to determine if all pieces of the baby’s body were removed.

A suction abortion is typically completed in 3-10 minutes.”

When a doctor lies, you must research the reason and basis for the lie. To lie to the people and provide false photos in order to further a false narrative should be considered medical malpractice.

The Mya Network should be shaking in its boots after telling the lie they have told. But they are not scared because they know they will never be held accountable for their misinformation. Their website states “You might be surprised to learn that pregnancies nine weeks and under have no visible embryo. And at six weeks of pregnancy the so-called “heartbeat” is just electrical activity of cells, before an actual heart is formed. “

Ultrasounds are an amazing tool. I had ultrasounds at 6-7 weeks gestation for all three of my children. And with all three children, I not only heard their heartbeats, I watched this single organ as it fluttered in their chests. I saw the outline of my child in utero. I saw the head. And at this stage, I was even told my prospective due date based on the size of the child growing inside of me. (Length and circumference of head) The Mya network showed the images of the tissue from apparent abortions. However, what the doctors neglect to mention is that abortion procedures at this state of pregnancy will destroy the embryos beyond all recognition. Meaning, when they “rinsed the tissue” of all color, they quite literally rinsed the child away before showing the photos. Instead, the lie is told that “you cannot see a baby in these photos because they’re just too small and undeveloped”. However, I think I can spot something the size of a large coin if presented to me. Can’t you?

The MYA network website quotes this directly before showing the same photos they provided to the guardian...

“We rinsed off the blood and menstrual lining (decidua) for these photographs.”

Well, oh dutiful doctors, you may want to check the sink drains before posting anymore photos, because you rinsed the baby itself directly into the sink.

The article by the guardian is extensively and almost exclusively quoted by an abortion provider who wants to expand all access to abortion. This article reprints photos that remove all context and even color from pregnancy tissue after an abortion when the embryo would be destroyed beyond recognition… The abortionist proceeds to complain that imagery produced by using microscopes or macro lenses to show an actual child at early gestation is ideologically driven. They believe we should listen to the word of an abortion provider over the internet and textbooks.

Lying to women by entirely removing the beating heart, developing organs and little toes of the person in the womb calls into question the integrity of The Guardian. But we already knew that, didn't we?

Perhaps the most heartbreaking of all, was the lie told to each of the mothers who chose to view their own pregnancy tissue after their abortion. (I will assume that they were shown after this "rinsing" process)

Quotes from actual patients

“It didn't look human like what you see in the apps. I felt a sense of ease." (Many apps show actual photos of babies at their gestational age). This patient chose abortion for the reason of convenience. She wants a career in New York.

“"It wasn't what I expected at all. It was so small...and seemed a lot less scary." This patient also chose abortion for the reason of convenience.

“Being able to look at what it actually is, removed all the scariness...and the guilt."

“It just looked like mucus, it was just a little thing...nothing that made us feel guilty."

The willfully ignorant will choose to listen and accept the article written by the Guardian as "their truth". The alternative would be too uncomfortable for their conscience and heart. The culture of convenience is killing us. Literally.

George Orwell said this in 1984

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”



Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page